CESP-Companhia Energetica de Sao Paulo 'BB-' Global And 'brAAA' National Scale Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Stable
SAO PAULO (S&P Global Ratings) July 5, 2019--S&P Global Ratings said today it affirmed its 'BB-' global scale and 'brAAA' national scale ratings on Brazil-based hydropower generator CESP-Companhia Energetica de Sao Paulo. The 'bbb-' stand-alone credit profile (SACP) is unchanged. The 'bbb-' SACP reflects our view that leverage metrics will remain at low levels regardless of the additional debt raised in the context of CESP's privatization because we expect the company to benefit from the operating efficiency initiatives that new management is gradually implementing, despite the constraint caused by the nearly single-asset nature of CESP's business. The ratings on the company remain capped by those on the Federative Republic of Brazil (global scale: BB-/Stable/B; Brazil national scale: brAAA/Stable/--), considering CESP's sensitivity to the domestic economy and because all of its assets and counterparties are located in the country. Following the privatization auction on Oct. 1, 2018, when the State of São Paulo sold its controlling stake to VTRM Energia Participações S.A. (not rated), we no longer see CESP as a government-related company. VTRM was established in 2017 to be the investment vehicle of Votorantim Energia, a subsidiary of Votorantim S.A. (BBB-/Stable/--; brAAA/Stable/--), and Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB; not rated) to explore opportunities in the Brazilian renewable energy sector. Although it also has two operational wind farms in northeast Brazil, we consider CESP a core subsidiary because it represents the bulk of the total assets. Given that VTRM is a joint venture, with no single shareholder having effective control, our analysis does not assume that CESP would be supported by either Votorantim or CPPIB. The stable outlook reflects that on the sovereign, given our view that the ratings on CESP are limited to our ratings on Brazil based on the company's sensitivity to the domestic economy and because all its assets and counterparties are located in the country. In this context, the 'bbb-' SACP, three notches above the issuer credit rating, provides a downward protection. Given that we cap the ratings on CESP at the sovereign level, if we were to downgrade Brazil in the next 12 months, we could take a similar rating action on the company. We don't envision a scenario in the near term that could lead us to lower the SACP. However, we could downgrade CESP if the company pursues a more aggressive financial policy, leading to net debt to EBITDA consistently above 2x. We don't expect an upgrade in the next 12 months, because our ratings on the company are capped at the sovereign level. A higher SACP is unlikely because the ratings are constrained by CESP's business risk profile, considering CESP's single-asset nature. CESP is a Brazil-based electric power generation company that maintains with three hydro plants, Porto Primavera (1.54 MW of capacity and concession rights until 2049), Jaguari (13 MW of installed capacity and concession rights until 2020), and Paraibuna (48 MW of installed capacity and concession rights until 2021), located in the state of São Paulo.
RELATED CRITERIA
- General Criteria: Group Rating Methodology, July 1, 2019
- Criteria | Corporates | General: Corporate Methodology: Ratios And Adjustments, April 1, 2019
- General Criteria: Methodology For National And Regional Scale Credit Ratings, June 25, 2018
- Criteria | Corporates | General: Methodology And Assumptions: Liquidity Descriptors For Global Corporate Issuers, Dec. 16, 2014
- General Criteria: Country Risk Assessment Methodology And Assumptions, Nov. 19, 2013
- Criteria | Corporates | General: Corporate Methodology, Nov. 19, 2013
- General Criteria: Methodology: Industry Risk, Nov. 19, 2013
- General Criteria: Ratings Above The Sovereign--Corporate And Government Ratings: Methodology And Assumptions, Nov. 19, 2013
- General Criteria: Methodology: Management And Governance Credit Factors For Corporate Entities And Insurers, Nov. 13, 2012
- General Criteria: Use Of CreditWatch And Outlooks, Sept. 14, 2009
Certain terms used in this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view on rating relevant factors, have specific meanings ascribed to them in our criteria, and should therefore be read in conjunction with such criteria. Please see Ratings Criteria at www.standardandpoors.com for further information. Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.capitaliq.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on S&P Global Ratings' public website at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Alvaro Landi, Sao Paulo (55) 11-3039-9757; alvaro.landi@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contact: | Marcelo Schwarz, CFA, Sao Paulo (55) 11-3039-9782; marcelo.schwarz@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.