Research Update: U.K.-Based Telecom Group BT Downgraded To 'BBB' On Weaker Performance And Cash Flow Prospects; Outlook Stable
Overview
- We expect U.K.-based telecom company BT Group to post revenues and EBITDA that are weaker than we previously anticipated over the next couple of years. This is due to the effects of fiber regulation, continued fierce competition in the enterprise and public sectors, a maturing consumer broadband market, and cost inflation.
- These operating risks, along with Brexit-related uncertainties, currently weaken our view of BT's business risk compared with some of its peers.
- The resulting combination of lower EBITDA, partly due to significant restructuring costs, and higher network investments significantly weakens BT's free operating cash flow (FOCF). This, along with stable dividend payouts, limits BT's ability to offset operating pressures with discretionary cash flow.
- We are therefore lowering our long-term issuer credit rating on BT to 'BBB' from 'BBB+'.
- The stable outlook reflects our view that cost reductions will largely offset revenue pressures and inherent cost inflation, enabling BT to maintain adjusted debt to EBITDA of 2.8x-3.0x and adjusted FOCF to debt of about 5%-6% over the next 24 months.
Rating Action
On June 12, 2018, S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term issuer credit rating on U.K.-based telecommunications group BT Group PLC (BT) and its fully owned subsidiary EE Ltd. to 'BBB' from 'BBB+'. The outlook is stable. We affirmed the short-term rating at 'A-2'.
Rationale
The downgrade reflects our view that BT's credit quality has weakened compared with 'BBB+' rated telecom peers. This is mainly due to:
- Ofcom's very strong regulatory oversight of Openreach, including the recent regulation of fiber under 40 megabits per second (MBps);
- Increased competition in the consumer broadband market, notably for fiber at speeds of up to 76 MBps;
- Continued fierce competition in the enterprise and public sectors, especially from TalkTalk;
- Maturing consumer broadband and TV markets while BT continues to face high football content costs; and
- Uncertainties regarding the medium-term impact of Brexit on consumer spending choices.
These pressures drive our expectation of weaker than previously anticipated revenues and EBITDA generation, and materially lower free operating cash flow generation in the current and next fiscal year. This is only partly offset by a lower pension deficit. As a result, we expect adjusted FOCF to debt to decline to about 5%-6% in fiscal 2019 (ending March 31) and 2020, from 13% in fiscal 2017 and 9% in fiscal 2018, well below our upgrade trigger of 12%. We only expect a return to EBITDA growth from 2021, and for it to be highly reliant on BT's execution of its consumer value-focused convergence plan and the significant cost-cutting plan, which includes the removal of 13,000 employees (mainly back office and middle management roles), somewhat offset by 6,000 new hires to support network deployment and customer service. Due to BT facing significant restructuring charges (of about £800 million), a step-up in capital expenditure (capex), and some additional spectrum acquisition, we forecast a meaningful decline in its free cash flow generation (before contributions to the pension deficit) to less than £1.5 billion in fiscals 2019 and 2020, from £1.9 billion in fiscal 2018. For BT, not reducing dividend payouts means breakeven to negative discretionary cash flows in fiscals 2019 and 2020, resulting in a further increase in adjusted debt and limiting BT's ability to offset operating pressures through debt reduction. At the same time, we understand BT is targeting a 'BBB+' rating over the cycle. On the back of the recent wholesale local access market review, Openreach faces significant revenue pressures. Most of this relates to the new caps on access to fiber of up to 40 MBps, which cuts the fees it charges other carriers by about 33% over three years, with about two-thirds of the effect of this being felt in fiscal 2019. In our view, this may have a knock-on effect on the pricing of access to higher speeds, which will otherwise become disproportionately expensive. The lower access fees could also drive even more pricing competition from Vodafone and TalkTalk, who are looking to grow their broadband subscriber base, thereby potentially limiting BT's ability to increase prices for its installed base. In our view, the recently announced convergence strategy of cross-selling value-added fixed and mobile products is positive and leverages BT's unique advantage in the U.K. through the ownership of both networks, creating meaningful cost advantages over peers. This network advantage as well as BT's dominance and brand are key strengths for our view of BT's business risk. We think this convergence strategy can be particularly successful when selling mobiles to existing BT customers. At the same time, given the potential impact of Brexit on consumer choices and BT's premium prices for its main brand compared to some of the other carriers, cross-selling products without any discount may be challenging. Despite our view that BT's credit quality has somewhat weakened, we view favorably the recent resolution of the pension review--notably the closure for further accrual of the defined benefit scheme. This not only limits the increase in the plan's future liabilities (meaning we currently forecast an ongoing decline in the deficit through contributions), but also reduces the ongoing cost inflation related to the pension scheme. In our base-case operating scenario for BT, we assume:
- About 2% revenue decline in fiscal 2019 and an additional drop of 1%-2% in 2020, from -1.4% in fiscal 2018, driven by the negative impact on Openreach of the expected reduction in fiber wholesale fees, weaknesses in wholesale and business; this is somewhat offset by about 1%-2% growth in BT's fixed consumer revenues (including EE).
- EBITDA margins of 30%-32% in fiscals 2019 and 2020 (before specific items) from 31.6% in financial 2018, on continual cost-cutting as well as the benefits of cost synergies from the integration of EE. These cost benefits are expected to largely offset increases in regulatory costs and cost inflation.
- Adjusted EBITDA margins of about 28.0% in fiscal 2019, down from 29.8% in fiscal 2018, improving to about 31.0% in 2020 due to lower restructuring charges and benefits of the planned cost reduction.
- Capex of about 15%-16% of sales excluding spectrum acquisition payments on increased investments related to FTTP and capacity, compared with about 14% in fiscal 2017-2018.
- Stable annual dividends of about £1.5 billion.
Based on these assumptions, we arrive at the following credit measures:
- Debt to EBITDA of about 3.0x in 2019 and 2.8x in 2020 (similar to 2018);
- Funds from operations (FFO; before pension recovery contributions) to debt of about 24% in 2019 and 25%-26% in 2020, from 27% in 2018; and
- FOCF (adjusted for pension recovery contributions) to debt of about 5%-6% in fiscals 2019 and 2020, down from 9% in 2018 and about 13% in 2017.
Liquidity
The short-term rating on BT is 'A-2'. We assess the group's liquidity as adequate. We estimate that BT's available liquidity sources will exceed uses by about 1.4x over the 12 months from March 31, 2018, comfortably above the minimum 1.2x threshold for our adequate liquidity category. For the 12 months started March 31, 2018, we calculate the following principal liquidity sources:
- Cash and liquid investments of about £3.55 billion;
- Our forecast of about £5.3 billion-£5.4 billion of FFO; and
- Undrawn committed revolving credit facility of £2.1 billion due in 2021. The facility has no financial covenants.
For the same period, we calculate the following principal liquidity uses:
- Debt amortizations of about £2.3 billion;
- Our forecast of annual capex of about £4.0 billion-£4.2 billion, including assumed spectrum acquisition; and
- Estimated shareholder returns of about £1.5 billion.
Outlook
The stable outlook reflects our view that execution of cost reduction will largely offset revenue pressures and inherent cost inflation, enabling BT to maintain adjusted debt to EBITDA of 2.8x-3.0x and adjusted FOCF to debt of about 5%-6% over the next 24 months.
Upside scenario
We could raise the rating if BT reduces its adjusted leverage to 2.5x and adjusted FOCF to debt to about 12% through a more conservative financial policy, for example, if it significantly reduces its cash paying dividends over the medium term. That said, we do not expect this over the next 12 months. We could also raise the rating over the longer term if we see operating risks significantly reducing, enabling BT to return to sustainable revenue growth and adjusted EBITDA margins approaching mid-30%.
Downside scenario
We see short-term downside risks as remote because we currently see BT's business as well established in the U.K., and given BT's track record of maintaining a prudent balance sheet profile with unadjusted net debt to EBITDA kept well below 2x. We could lower the rating if adjusted debt to EBITDA increases to about 3.5x and FOCF generation were to weaken further, which would likely be on the back of significantly stronger than anticipated operating pressures in its consumer divisions.
Ratings Score Snapshot
Issuer Credit Rating: BBB/Stable/A-2 Business risk: Satisfactory
- Country risk: Low
- Industry risk: Intermediate
- Competitive position: Satisfactory
Financial risk: Intermediate
- Cash flow/Leverage: Intermediate
Anchor: bbb Modifiers
- Diversification/Portfolio effect: Neutral (no impact)
- Capital structure: Neutral (no impact)
- Financial policy: Neutral (no impact)
- Liquidity: Adequate (no impact)
- Management and governance: fair (no impact)
- Comparable ratings analysis: Neutral (no impact)
Issue Ratings--Subordination Risk Analysis
We rate the group's senior unsecured debt at the same level as the issuer credit rating. This is because the majority of BT's debt ranks pari passu. The only priority liabilities we consider for BT are the notes at EE, which comprise less than 10% of the group total debt--significantly below our 50% threshold for notching down. We therefore do not estimate any material subordination risk for BT's rated debt instruments.
Related Criteria
- Criteria - Corporates - General: Reflecting Subordination Risk In Corporate Issue Ratings, March 28, 2018
- General Criteria: Methodology For Linking Long-Term And Short-Term Ratings , April 7, 2017
- Criteria - Corporates - General: Methodology And Assumptions: Liquidity Descriptors For Global Corporate Issuers, Dec. 16, 2014
- Criteria - Corporates - Industrials: Key Credit Factors For The Telecommunications And Cable Industry, June 22, 2014
- General Criteria: Group Rating Methodology, Nov. 19, 2013
- Criteria - Corporates - General: Corporate Methodology: Ratios And Adjustments, Nov. 19, 2013
- Criteria - Corporates - General: Corporate Methodology, Nov. 19, 2013
- General Criteria: Country Risk Assessment Methodology And Assumptions, Nov. 19, 2013
- General Criteria: Methodology: Industry Risk, Nov. 19, 2013
- General Criteria: Methodology: Management And Governance Credit Factors For Corporate Entities And Insurers, Nov. 13, 2012
- General Criteria: Use Of CreditWatch And Outlooks, Sept. 14, 2009
Ratings List
Downgraded; Outlook Action; Ratings Affirmed To From BT Group PLC EE Ltd. EE Finance PLC British Telecommunications PLC Issuer Credit Rating BBB/Stable/A-2 BBB+/Negative/A-2 British Telecommunications PLC EE Finance PLC Senior Unsecured BBB BBB+ Ratings Affirmed British Telecommunications PLC Commercial Paper A-2
Certain terms used in this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view on rating relevant factors, have specific meanings ascribed to them in our criteria, and should therefore be read in conjunction with such criteria. Please see Ratings Criteria at www.standardandpoors.com for further information. Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.capitaliq.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on S&P Global Ratings' public website at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column. Alternatively, call one of the following S&P Global Ratings numbers: Client Support Europe (44) 20-7176-7176; London Press Office (44) 20-7176-3605; Paris (33) 1-4420-6708; Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-225; Stockholm (46) 8-440-5914; or Moscow 7 (495) 783-4009.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Osnat Jaeger, London (44) 20-7176-7066; osnat.jaeger@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contact: | Xavier Buffon, Paris (33) 1-4420-6675; xavier.buffon@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.